The trouble with doing a blog like this is that sometimes things are so well known that you think you've covered it already, but you actually haven't! This happened to me last week when talking about Krypton's prison rings; I mentioned an example and went to link to it, only to discover I'd never written about it before. Luckily, I needed a post for this final week of the year, so it works out. And that example - which you already know if you've read the title - is Jor-El's hologram.
See, everyone knows that Jor-El sent a baby Superman to Earth in a rocket to save him from the exploding Krypton. And for a long time, that was the story. Superman eventually learned about Krypton through time travel, Phantom Zone criminals, and various things that fell to Earth, but it was something that happened over time.
That was not the case in Superman: The Movie (1976). This depiction that Clark come to Earth with a crystal that, when dropped into the Arctic Circle for whatever reason, formed the Fortress of Solitude. Inside the Fortress was a hologram of Jor-El that could tell Superman pretty much anything he wanted to know about Krypton or any other location in the 28 known galaxies.
Originally, this did not affect the comics at all. In fact, even when Superman's origin was updated in the 80s, it would've been impossible because Superman's ship was a "birthing matrix" that housed an unborn Kal-El. There was nothing that would hold a crystal or anything else. But when they updated his origin again in Superman: Birthright (2003 - 2004), we see that - perhaps because they reverted to the rocket of the classic origin - Jor-El packed a tablet in the rocket that acts as a Kryptonian encyclopedia. However, despite the tablet passing a very brief message from the adult Superman back to Jor-El and Lara, it does not allow for a Jor-El AI to act as a surrogate father figure, as in the movie and Smallville versions.
That all changed in Action Comics #844 (October 2006), around the same time the Fortress of Solitude came to resemble the one from the movies. Now Jor-El was a fully interactive hologram.
Thankfully it didn't stick. My personal belief is that Superman should have as little interaction with Jor-El as possible; my ideal version of Superman considers the Kents his real parents and has an alive Jonathan (and Martha) to talk to when he needs help. It seems a lot of people disagree with me on this point, however.
Subheader
A forever in-work compendium of Marvel and DC canon immigrants. What's a canon immigrant? Go here to find out!
Showing posts with label Film. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Film. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 25, 2019
Wednesday, December 18, 2019
Gadget Spotlight: Kryptonian Prison Rings
For some reason, people love Superman: The Movie. I don't get it, personally. Although Christopher Reeve is perfect as Clark Kent and Superman, nearly everything else about it falls flat for me. Especially the aesthetic, particularly the Kryptonian aesthetic. Still, people love it for some reason, so the aesthetic has crept into most modern adaptations, even when it doesn't make any sense. (Seriously, why would the Fortress of Solitude - which is meant to be Superman's home away from home - look like an ice cave instead of actually cozy and livable? It's silly. But I digress.)
With the comics, this happened for the first time - as far as I know - in 2006 when Geoff Johns took over writing Action Comics. Among other changes, suddenly the Fortress was crystal, Jor-El was a hologram, Ben Hubbard appeared, and Zod's crew (now Ursa and Non) dressed all in black. Also, the Kryptonian prison rings debuted.
In the movie (1976), we see Zod, Ursa, and Non imprisoned in spinning rings while they wait to be sent to the Phantom Zone.
With the comics, this happened for the first time - as far as I know - in 2006 when Geoff Johns took over writing Action Comics. Among other changes, suddenly the Fortress was crystal, Jor-El was a hologram, Ben Hubbard appeared, and Zod's crew (now Ursa and Non) dressed all in black. Also, the Kryptonian prison rings debuted.
In the movie (1976), we see Zod, Ursa, and Non imprisoned in spinning rings while they wait to be sent to the Phantom Zone.
In Action Comics #846 (December 2006), we get a hint to this technology when we see Phantom Zone criminals with rings around them.
Action Comics Annual #10 (January 2007) shows Zod, Ursa, and Non in a more standard depiction of the rings.
Action Comics Annual #10 (January 2007) shows Zod, Ursa, and Non in a more standard depiction of the rings.
And Superman: World of New Krypton #5 (July 2009) shows the rings on the cover and throughout the book.
To my knowledge, they have not been seen since, and thank goodness for that.
Friday, December 13, 2019
Flashback Friday: JARVIS
Each Friday, I take one of the entries from my old Super Posts and expand it into its own featured article.
This week: J.A.R.V.I.S.!
Tony Stark's butler, Edwin Jarvis, who first appeared in Tales of Suspense #59 (September 1964)...
...was adapted for the Iron Man movie (2008) as an advanced AI that controlled the Stark Mansion (and the Iron Man suit later on) and was called J.A.R.V.I.S., which was explained in the movie novelization to stand for "Just A Rather Very Intelligent System".
J.A.R.V.I.S. later appears, which the same acronym explanation, in Invincible Iron Man #11 (March 2009), this time based on the personality of the real Jarvis and as the controller AI of Pepper Potts's "Rescue" armor.
As a side note, J.A.R.V.I.S.'s personality being based on a real Edwin Jarvis, who presumably helped raise Tony when he was young, was a common MCU fan theory. This was later confirmed when Agent Carter had Jarvis in a major supporting role across both seasons.
This week: J.A.R.V.I.S.!
Tony Stark's butler, Edwin Jarvis, who first appeared in Tales of Suspense #59 (September 1964)...
...was adapted for the Iron Man movie (2008) as an advanced AI that controlled the Stark Mansion (and the Iron Man suit later on) and was called J.A.R.V.I.S., which was explained in the movie novelization to stand for "Just A Rather Very Intelligent System".
J.A.R.V.I.S. later appears, which the same acronym explanation, in Invincible Iron Man #11 (March 2009), this time based on the personality of the real Jarvis and as the controller AI of Pepper Potts's "Rescue" armor.
As a side note, J.A.R.V.I.S.'s personality being based on a real Edwin Jarvis, who presumably helped raise Tony when he was young, was a common MCU fan theory. This was later confirmed when Agent Carter had Jarvis in a major supporting role across both seasons.
Wednesday, December 4, 2019
Character Spotlight: Dr. Chase Meridian
It's funny how standards slip as deadlines loom. Normally I don't include immigrants until they've been in a mainstream universe, but I didn't want the last couple weeks of this year to not have new content (even though I started doing Flashback Friday for just such an occasion), so here we are.
Batman Forever (1995) wanted to be a serious look into the psychology of Batman. You probably wouldn't recognize that from the final product, which had most of that particular plotline excised, but one artifact that remains is Dr. Chase Meridian, Bruce Wayne's love interest for the movie and a psychiatrist who is obsessed with Batman. Her name is a pun because she was supposed to help Bruce find a balance between his two personas; ie, "chase" the "meridian".
Despite being played by Nicole Kidman at her Nicole Kidmanest in a very successful movie (second highest-grossing movie of 1995 and highest-grossing opening weekend, which it held until 1997), Chase Meridian never made an impact on the comics. Even when she finally crossed over, it was only in an out-of-continuity digital comic. Specifically, it was Legends of the Dark Knight #77-79 (November 2013), which was later collected in Legends of the Dark Knight 100-Page Spectacular #4 (September 2014). Notably, she has a completely different look than the movie.
Personally, I think Dr. Meridian could fill a hole in the Batman universe. You'd think a series with an asylum as a major set piece would have a recurring psychologist/psychiatrist character. In fact, it has two, but they're both villains: Harley Quinn and Hugo Strange. It would be very beneficial, I think, to have Chase as a supervillain expert who also doesn't play their games.
Batman Forever (1995) wanted to be a serious look into the psychology of Batman. You probably wouldn't recognize that from the final product, which had most of that particular plotline excised, but one artifact that remains is Dr. Chase Meridian, Bruce Wayne's love interest for the movie and a psychiatrist who is obsessed with Batman. Her name is a pun because she was supposed to help Bruce find a balance between his two personas; ie, "chase" the "meridian".
Despite being played by Nicole Kidman at her Nicole Kidmanest in a very successful movie (second highest-grossing movie of 1995 and highest-grossing opening weekend, which it held until 1997), Chase Meridian never made an impact on the comics. Even when she finally crossed over, it was only in an out-of-continuity digital comic. Specifically, it was Legends of the Dark Knight #77-79 (November 2013), which was later collected in Legends of the Dark Knight 100-Page Spectacular #4 (September 2014). Notably, she has a completely different look than the movie.
Personally, I think Dr. Meridian could fill a hole in the Batman universe. You'd think a series with an asylum as a major set piece would have a recurring psychologist/psychiatrist character. In fact, it has two, but they're both villains: Harley Quinn and Hugo Strange. It would be very beneficial, I think, to have Chase as a supervillain expert who also doesn't play their games.
Friday, November 22, 2019
Flashback Friday: Mystique's Movie Design
Each Friday, I take one of the entries from my old Super Posts and expand it into its own featured article.
This week: Mystique's movie design!
It can't be understated how big the first X-Men movie was in 2000. Avengers: Endgame becoming the top-grossing movie of all time can be traced directly back to the success of this movie. It was certainly the most important Marvel adaptation at the time, and Marvel - generally not one to have major canon immigrants at the time - bent over backwards to make the comics better reflect the movies.
As I'm sure you know, X-Men was much different from the comics of the time. The team was smaller and wore black leather. Xavier's was an actual school. The Brotherhood was made of some of the team's biggest villains (and Toad), and nearly all of them had a less human appearance than normal. The changes go on and on. Mystique in particular was naked with small spikes all over her skin. The rationale for her nakedness was that, if she morphed clothes, she'd be naked regardless (although let's be honest: they just wanted Rebecca Romijn to be naked); the textured skin was never explained.
But that's not how Mystique appeared in the comics. From her first appearance in Ms. Marvel #18 (April 1978), she's had more or less the same iconic look.
In 2001, Marvel started publishing a miniseries called X-Men Forever, ostensibly to build on the success of Avengers Forever. Like that series, this one would travel through the X-Men's history, but that's where the similarities end. While Avengers Forever's ultimate goal was to explain away some continuity bugs, the goal of X-Men Forever was simply to make the X-Men more like the comics. And that is how, in issue 6 (April 2001), Mystique came to look like this:
To say the change didn't last would be putting it lightly. It might as well have not happened at all. Her next published appearance that wasn't a flashback or morphed was a year later in Uncanny X-Men #404 (April 2002). She looks normal.
In fact, the only other appearance I can find of Mystique's movie form is in X-Treme X-Men #32 (October 2003), when a mutant named Revenant make Rogue think she's turning into Mystique.
And that's not even really Mystique. But that's for the best, because it's not a great design. I think the movies have realized that too, because over time, her skin has gotten smoother and smoother and she's started wearing clothes even when unmorphed.
This week: Mystique's movie design!
It can't be understated how big the first X-Men movie was in 2000. Avengers: Endgame becoming the top-grossing movie of all time can be traced directly back to the success of this movie. It was certainly the most important Marvel adaptation at the time, and Marvel - generally not one to have major canon immigrants at the time - bent over backwards to make the comics better reflect the movies.
As I'm sure you know, X-Men was much different from the comics of the time. The team was smaller and wore black leather. Xavier's was an actual school. The Brotherhood was made of some of the team's biggest villains (and Toad), and nearly all of them had a less human appearance than normal. The changes go on and on. Mystique in particular was naked with small spikes all over her skin. The rationale for her nakedness was that, if she morphed clothes, she'd be naked regardless (although let's be honest: they just wanted Rebecca Romijn to be naked); the textured skin was never explained.
But that's not how Mystique appeared in the comics. From her first appearance in Ms. Marvel #18 (April 1978), she's had more or less the same iconic look.
In 2001, Marvel started publishing a miniseries called X-Men Forever, ostensibly to build on the success of Avengers Forever. Like that series, this one would travel through the X-Men's history, but that's where the similarities end. While Avengers Forever's ultimate goal was to explain away some continuity bugs, the goal of X-Men Forever was simply to make the X-Men more like the comics. And that is how, in issue 6 (April 2001), Mystique came to look like this:
To say the change didn't last would be putting it lightly. It might as well have not happened at all. Her next published appearance that wasn't a flashback or morphed was a year later in Uncanny X-Men #404 (April 2002). She looks normal.
In fact, the only other appearance I can find of Mystique's movie form is in X-Treme X-Men #32 (October 2003), when a mutant named Revenant make Rogue think she's turning into Mystique.
And that's not even really Mystique. But that's for the best, because it's not a great design. I think the movies have realized that too, because over time, her skin has gotten smoother and smoother and she's started wearing clothes even when unmorphed.
Friday, October 18, 2019
Flashback Friday: The Batcave
Each Friday, I take one of the entries from my old Super Posts and expand it into its own featured article.
This week: The Batcave!
Originally, the closest thing Batman had to a Batcave was an old barn he used for a hangar/garage, which he accessed via underground tunnel connected to Wayne Manor. You can see it here in Detective Comics #48 (December 1940).
In Batman #12 (June 1942), we see underground hangars as an extension of the above idea, but they're presented as man-made. Incidentally, Batman #12 is the first appearance of Batman's trophy room, which is housed in Wayne Manor and mainly exists as a way for Batman and Robin to talk about past cases.
In 1943, Batman received his first serial, also called Batman. In it, Batman was a government agent and his base was a cave called The Bat's Cave, which debuted in the chapter of the same name (July 1943). It didn't house much except a desk and some science equipment. Although it was thematically appropriate, the only reason for it was as a money-saving measure since the studio already had a cave set.
It was thematically appropriate, though, so the Batcave itself first appeared in Detective Comics #83 (November 1943). Note that the image is essentially the same as the one above, only now drawn so that it exists in a natural cave. Also note that they've moved the trophy room into the Batcave.
Interestingly, Detective Comics #205 (January 1954) shows that Bruce originally planned to use the barn as his base of operations, but he fell through the floor and discovered the cave. That's a neat way to smooth that history!...although you'll also notice this says Bruce bought Wayne Manor as an adult, which is its own continuity snafu.
The Batcave, of course, has become a major part of the Batman mythos, appearing in every film and tv adaptation since, even the "grounded" Christopher Nolan films. It also, of course, continued to appear in comics after the New 52 and Rebirth.
This week: The Batcave!
Originally, the closest thing Batman had to a Batcave was an old barn he used for a hangar/garage, which he accessed via underground tunnel connected to Wayne Manor. You can see it here in Detective Comics #48 (December 1940).
In Batman #12 (June 1942), we see underground hangars as an extension of the above idea, but they're presented as man-made. Incidentally, Batman #12 is the first appearance of Batman's trophy room, which is housed in Wayne Manor and mainly exists as a way for Batman and Robin to talk about past cases.
In 1943, Batman received his first serial, also called Batman. In it, Batman was a government agent and his base was a cave called The Bat's Cave, which debuted in the chapter of the same name (July 1943). It didn't house much except a desk and some science equipment. Although it was thematically appropriate, the only reason for it was as a money-saving measure since the studio already had a cave set.
It was thematically appropriate, though, so the Batcave itself first appeared in Detective Comics #83 (November 1943). Note that the image is essentially the same as the one above, only now drawn so that it exists in a natural cave. Also note that they've moved the trophy room into the Batcave.
Interestingly, Detective Comics #205 (January 1954) shows that Bruce originally planned to use the barn as his base of operations, but he fell through the floor and discovered the cave. That's a neat way to smooth that history!...although you'll also notice this says Bruce bought Wayne Manor as an adult, which is its own continuity snafu.
The Batcave, of course, has become a major part of the Batman mythos, appearing in every film and tv adaptation since, even the "grounded" Christopher Nolan films. It also, of course, continued to appear in comics after the New 52 and Rebirth.
Wednesday, October 9, 2019
Appearance Spotlight: Lady Octopus
There's a strange phenomenon that happens as part of being a comics fan: the characters and concepts you're introduced to in your first couple years of reading comics become far more important in your mind than they are in the grand scheme of the universe. It's certainly true of me. It's why the Slingers are one of my favorite superteams, it's why I'm still disappointed Conduit never appeared in Smallville, and it's why my favorite Scarlet Witch outfit will always be this one. It's also why I'm glad Lady Octopus is having a resurgence.
Lady Octopus, or Doctor Octopus as she was originally called, was a former student of the original Doctor Octopus, who took over the role when he died. She first appeared in Amazing Spider-Man #406 (August 1995), and as that story is not only in the mid-90s, but in the Clone Saga as well, her story is needlessly complicated. I won't get into it all here, but suffice to say, it involves blending reality and virtual reality. Again, mid-90s.
After the original Doc Ock returned, she started going by Lady Octopus and only made sporadic appearances here and there. Recently she had a cameo in Amazing Spider-Man #17 (March 2019), though not wearing either her classic costume or her current one...
...which is strange, because in the next issue - Amazing Spider-Man #20 (April 2019) - she IS wearing an updated version of her classic outfit. Looking at the two, it seems like the one above is simply a coloring error, but I don't know that for sure.
A few months later, though, she appears in a brand new costume with the new Sinister Syndicate in Amazing Spider-Man #25 (July 2019).
What's the deal? Well, only a few months earlier - December 2018 - a movie called Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse was released. And one of the many villains who appeared in that movie was a female Doctor Octopus. To be clear, she is not Carolyn Trainer. She's Olivia Octavius, the CEO of Alchemax. She looks like this.
Clearly it's not an exact match. But side-by-side, it's easy to spot the similarities. The long, pulled-up brown hair instead of the short brown, black, or pink hair. The green, round goggles. The cream chestpiece. The green abdomen. The black arms and legs, and the lighter colored...thigh-highs, for lack of a better word.
One thing I wish they would've adapted was Olivia's clear, more lifelike tentacles, which would have made her more distinct from the original Doc Ock. But either way, it's nice to see a great movie like Into the Spider-Verse already impacting the comics!
Lady Octopus, or Doctor Octopus as she was originally called, was a former student of the original Doctor Octopus, who took over the role when he died. She first appeared in Amazing Spider-Man #406 (August 1995), and as that story is not only in the mid-90s, but in the Clone Saga as well, her story is needlessly complicated. I won't get into it all here, but suffice to say, it involves blending reality and virtual reality. Again, mid-90s.
After the original Doc Ock returned, she started going by Lady Octopus and only made sporadic appearances here and there. Recently she had a cameo in Amazing Spider-Man #17 (March 2019), though not wearing either her classic costume or her current one...
...which is strange, because in the next issue - Amazing Spider-Man #20 (April 2019) - she IS wearing an updated version of her classic outfit. Looking at the two, it seems like the one above is simply a coloring error, but I don't know that for sure.
A few months later, though, she appears in a brand new costume with the new Sinister Syndicate in Amazing Spider-Man #25 (July 2019).
What's the deal? Well, only a few months earlier - December 2018 - a movie called Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse was released. And one of the many villains who appeared in that movie was a female Doctor Octopus. To be clear, she is not Carolyn Trainer. She's Olivia Octavius, the CEO of Alchemax. She looks like this.
Clearly it's not an exact match. But side-by-side, it's easy to spot the similarities. The long, pulled-up brown hair instead of the short brown, black, or pink hair. The green, round goggles. The cream chestpiece. The green abdomen. The black arms and legs, and the lighter colored...thigh-highs, for lack of a better word.
One thing I wish they would've adapted was Olivia's clear, more lifelike tentacles, which would have made her more distinct from the original Doc Ock. But either way, it's nice to see a great movie like Into the Spider-Verse already impacting the comics!
Friday, October 4, 2019
Flashback Friday: The Phantom Zone's Appearance
Each Friday, I take one of the entries from my old Super Posts and expand it into its own featured article.
This week: The Phantom Zone's appearance!
The Phantom Zone first appeared in Adventure Comics #283 (February 1961), where Superboy discovered it accidentally. In a crate of Kryptonian artifacts that landed on Earth, he came across the Phantom Zone Projector, which incorporealized him. The Phantom Zone would later become a major part of the mythology, housing multiple Kryptonian criminals and being the method through which Mon-El winds up in the 30th century alongside the Legion of Super-Heroes.
In Superboy #185 (March 1972), the last appearance I can find prior to the movie, the Phantom Zone is still accessed via Phantom Zone Projector.
In Superman: The Movie (1978), the Phantom Zone is depicted very differently. In this, the Zone resembles a mirror pane that flies through space...seemingly controlled by Krypton, though it's unclear whether they created it or simply harnessed it. Criminals can see the world through the pane, and if it breaks, the criminals can escape.
The Phantom Zone mostly disappeared after Crisis on Infinite Earths, as its main role was housing Kryptonian criminals, and if Superman's the only surviving Kryptonian, there's no one to house. But it slowly creeped back into continuity, the way things usually do, to the point that Green Arrow's partner, Speedy, had a Phantom Zone Arrow in Teen Titans #32 (January 2006). When she used it on Superboy-Prime, the glass depiction of the Phantom Zone appeared in comics for the first time. This was a part of a larger trend of making the Superman books more like the movie at the time.
Although this never became the standard way to show the Phantom Zone, it did continue to appear from time to time. It even survived the New 52 and Rebirth, as seen in Superman #2 (June 2018).
This version of the Phantom Zone mainly appears in parodies and homages, but it does occasionally sneak into adaptations. Smallville, which likewise takes many visual and plot-related cues from the movie series, is one example.
You gotta admit: it's a good visual.
This week: The Phantom Zone's appearance!
The Phantom Zone first appeared in Adventure Comics #283 (February 1961), where Superboy discovered it accidentally. In a crate of Kryptonian artifacts that landed on Earth, he came across the Phantom Zone Projector, which incorporealized him. The Phantom Zone would later become a major part of the mythology, housing multiple Kryptonian criminals and being the method through which Mon-El winds up in the 30th century alongside the Legion of Super-Heroes.
In Superboy #185 (March 1972), the last appearance I can find prior to the movie, the Phantom Zone is still accessed via Phantom Zone Projector.
In Superman: The Movie (1978), the Phantom Zone is depicted very differently. In this, the Zone resembles a mirror pane that flies through space...seemingly controlled by Krypton, though it's unclear whether they created it or simply harnessed it. Criminals can see the world through the pane, and if it breaks, the criminals can escape.
The Phantom Zone mostly disappeared after Crisis on Infinite Earths, as its main role was housing Kryptonian criminals, and if Superman's the only surviving Kryptonian, there's no one to house. But it slowly creeped back into continuity, the way things usually do, to the point that Green Arrow's partner, Speedy, had a Phantom Zone Arrow in Teen Titans #32 (January 2006). When she used it on Superboy-Prime, the glass depiction of the Phantom Zone appeared in comics for the first time. This was a part of a larger trend of making the Superman books more like the movie at the time.
Although this never became the standard way to show the Phantom Zone, it did continue to appear from time to time. It even survived the New 52 and Rebirth, as seen in Superman #2 (June 2018).
This version of the Phantom Zone mainly appears in parodies and homages, but it does occasionally sneak into adaptations. Smallville, which likewise takes many visual and plot-related cues from the movie series, is one example.
You gotta admit: it's a good visual.
Wednesday, September 25, 2019
Star-Lord's and Gamora's Relationship
The current and most well-known version of the Guardians of the Galaxy team formed in the 2006 event, Annihilation. Eight years later, they received their own movie, 2014's Guardians of the Galaxy. In that time, they appeared in 75 issues across multiple titles. In the five years since then, they have appeared in over 200 issues. That is almost entirely due to the success they've had on film. So it's no surprise the comics have steadily changed to make them more like their movie counterparts, from character designs like Star-Lord and Nebula, to new concepts like the Milano and the Ravagers, to relationships like Nebula and Gamora. It's another Gamora relationship we'll talk about today, this time between her and Star-Lord.
In the comics, Gamora does have a romantic relationship with a fellow Guardian, but it's Nova, aka Richard Rider. This is first seen in Annihilation #1 (August 2006) and lasts until his death in the Cancerverse (Guardians of the Galaxy #20, June 2014).
In the films, however, Gamora has a relationship with Star-Lord. In the first film it's mostly flirting, but they're officially together during the second film.
But this all changed in the latest volume of Guardians of the Galaxy. Although it's been building since Infinity Wars, they officially get together in Guardians of the Galaxy #7 (July 2019).
Is this a temporary thing or will they go the distance? Only time will tell.
In the comics, Gamora does have a romantic relationship with a fellow Guardian, but it's Nova, aka Richard Rider. This is first seen in Annihilation #1 (August 2006) and lasts until his death in the Cancerverse (Guardians of the Galaxy #20, June 2014).
In the films, however, Gamora has a relationship with Star-Lord. In the first film it's mostly flirting, but they're officially together during the second film.
But this all changed in the latest volume of Guardians of the Galaxy. Although it's been building since Infinity Wars, they officially get together in Guardians of the Galaxy #7 (July 2019).
Is this a temporary thing or will they go the distance? Only time will tell.
Wednesday, September 11, 2019
Appearance Spotlight: Killmonger
Black Panther's Killmonger is easily among the best Marvel Cinematic Universe villains, due to a combination of a sympathetic backstory and goal and being played by the charismatic Michael B. Jordan.
In the comics, Killmonger's backstory is pretty much the same although his goal is exactly the opposite (making Wakanda even more isolationist rather than sharing its technology with the world), but another important difference is their appearance. While the movie's Killmonger where's a leopard-inspired take on Black Panther's armor...
...the comics version of Killmonger goes for more a gladiator-esque look.
And that's still true today, for this Killmonger. But it's not true for another Killmonger. See, in Black Panther volume 7 by Ta-Nehisi Coates establishes an "Intergalactic Empire of Wakanda" that's some combination of in another reality and 2000 years in the future. I'm a little unclear based on what I could find online. Regardless, many of the people in this storyline share their names with Wakandans we know, including Emperor N'Jadaka, who's named after Killmonger. And his armor looks like this:
Note that it's not an exact recreation, and the MCU's Killmonger certainly doesn't have a cape made from a Symbiote, but it's still close enough that it's easy to tell what they were going for.
In the comics, Killmonger's backstory is pretty much the same although his goal is exactly the opposite (making Wakanda even more isolationist rather than sharing its technology with the world), but another important difference is their appearance. While the movie's Killmonger where's a leopard-inspired take on Black Panther's armor...
...the comics version of Killmonger goes for more a gladiator-esque look.
And that's still true today, for this Killmonger. But it's not true for another Killmonger. See, in Black Panther volume 7 by Ta-Nehisi Coates establishes an "Intergalactic Empire of Wakanda" that's some combination of in another reality and 2000 years in the future. I'm a little unclear based on what I could find online. Regardless, many of the people in this storyline share their names with Wakandans we know, including Emperor N'Jadaka, who's named after Killmonger. And his armor looks like this:
Note that it's not an exact recreation, and the MCU's Killmonger certainly doesn't have a cape made from a Symbiote, but it's still close enough that it's easy to tell what they were going for.
Friday, August 30, 2019
Flashback Friday: Bullseye's Appearance
Each Friday, I take one of the entries from my old Super Posts and expand it into its own featured article.
This week: Bullseye's appearance!
Bullseye, the long-time Daredevil villain with perfect aim, has one of the best looks around, in my opinion.
But in the early 2000s, comic book adaptations had a strange relationship with comic book accuracy. Although they were looking to the comics for stories more than ever before, the character designs were generally more "realistic" and "down to Earth". That's why, in Daredevil (February 2003), Bullseye looks like this below. The strange thing is that he asks for a costume halfway through the movie, but still doesn't get one.
In the miniseries Daredevil/Bullseye: The Target #1 (September 2002), Bullseye starts wearing plainclothes to draw less attention to himself, but someone complains, so he draws a target on his forehead like so (below). Now I know what you're thinking: this came out almost half a year before the movie. What gives? Well, the movie design had been released by June 2002, so that gives plenty of time for both the fans and the comics creators to become familiar with it.
In Daredevil #48 (June 2003), we get an even more movie-accurate version. In the next issue, we learn it's a tattoo instead of a scar.
But then in Daredevil #49 (July 2003), Daredevil carves it into his head, meaning it will become a scar.
He was back in his classic outfit by Thunderbolts #110 (January 2007)...
...although interestingly, the ditching of his costume seemed to only happen in Daredevil. Whenever he appeared in miniseries during this time, such as Identity Disc (June 2004), Bullseye: Greatest Hits (September 2004), or Punisher vs. Bullseye (November 2005), he wore his classic outfit.
Presumably he still has the scar, but we never see it.
This week: Bullseye's appearance!
Bullseye, the long-time Daredevil villain with perfect aim, has one of the best looks around, in my opinion.
But in the early 2000s, comic book adaptations had a strange relationship with comic book accuracy. Although they were looking to the comics for stories more than ever before, the character designs were generally more "realistic" and "down to Earth". That's why, in Daredevil (February 2003), Bullseye looks like this below. The strange thing is that he asks for a costume halfway through the movie, but still doesn't get one.
In the miniseries Daredevil/Bullseye: The Target #1 (September 2002), Bullseye starts wearing plainclothes to draw less attention to himself, but someone complains, so he draws a target on his forehead like so (below). Now I know what you're thinking: this came out almost half a year before the movie. What gives? Well, the movie design had been released by June 2002, so that gives plenty of time for both the fans and the comics creators to become familiar with it.
In Daredevil #48 (June 2003), we get an even more movie-accurate version. In the next issue, we learn it's a tattoo instead of a scar.
But then in Daredevil #49 (July 2003), Daredevil carves it into his head, meaning it will become a scar.
He was back in his classic outfit by Thunderbolts #110 (January 2007)...
...although interestingly, the ditching of his costume seemed to only happen in Daredevil. Whenever he appeared in miniseries during this time, such as Identity Disc (June 2004), Bullseye: Greatest Hits (September 2004), or Punisher vs. Bullseye (November 2005), he wore his classic outfit.
Presumably he still has the scar, but we never see it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


























